Dismissed

Sri. V.R Raju v. the Mandya National Paper

Karnataka HC15 Nov 2023CA/46/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Karnataka High Court disposed of Company Application No. 46 of 2012 filed under Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC seeking impleadment as Respondent No. 2. The court referred to a prior order permitting similar parties to approach the Official Liquidator and directed the applicant to file a request before the liquidator instead.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed of with direction to file request before Official Liquidator in terms of prior order.

Sri. V.R Raju Vs the Mandya National Paper — Company and Corporate | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

CA No.783 of 2011

¶3

NC: 2023:KHC:41620 CA No. 46 of 2012 IN

¶4

IN COP No.112 of 1994

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA

¶8

COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 46 OF 2012

¶9

¶10

COMPANY APPLICATION NO.783 OF 2011

¶11

¶12

COMPANY PETITION NO.112 OF 1994

¶13

BETWEEN:

¶14

SRI V.R RAJU S/O LATE VENKATARAM RAJU SINCE DEAD BY HIS LR

¶15

Digitally signed by BHARATHI S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶16

SMT R CHANDRAVATHI W/O LATE RAJU V R AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT NO.18/B, MNPM HOUSING COLONY BELAGULA 571606 MANDYA DISTRICT

¶17

…APPLICANT

¶18

(BY SRI K.A. PRAKASH,ADVOCATE)

¶19

AND:

¶20

THE MANDYA NATIONAL PAPER MILLS LTD. (IN LIQDN.) A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT,1956 HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AND MILLS AT BELAGULA 571606

¶21

- 2 - NC: 2023:KHC:41620 CA No. 46 of 2012 IN CA No.783 of 2011 IN COP No.112 of 1994

¶22

REPRESENTED BY OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 12^TH FLOOR, RAHEJA TOWERS M G ROAD, BANGALORE 560001.

¶23

…RESPONDENT

¶24

THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 1 RULE 10(2) R/W SEC. 151 OF C.P.C. FURTHER R/W RULES 6 AND 9 OF THE COMPANIES (COURT) RULES, 1959 PRAYING TO IMPLEAD MR L GOVINDARAJ, S/O MR. LASER AS PARTY RESPONDENT NO.2.

¶25

THIS APPLICATION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶26

ORDER

¶27

C.A. No.46/2012 is filed by a 3^rd party applicant to

¶28

implead as Respondent No.2 in C.A. No.783/2011.

¶29

C.A. No.783/2011 was disposed of vide order

¶30

dated 09.03.2012. In the said order dated 09.03.2012, it is forthcoming that the applicants who were similarly placed persons were permitted to approach the Official Liquidator to establish the facts that was sought to asserted in the application.

¶31

In view of the same, C.A. No.46/2012 is also disposed of keeping open the remedy of the applicant to

¶32

3 - NC: 2023:KHC:41620 CA No. 46 of 2012 IN CA No.783 of 2011 IN COP No.112 of 1994

¶33

file suitable request before the official liquidator in terms

¶34

of the order dated 09.03.2012.

¶35

Ordered accordingly.

¶36

Sd/JUDGE

¶37

BS List No.: Sl No.:

Sri. V.R Raju v. the Mandya National Paper

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri. V.R Raju v. the Mandya National Paper

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yeliyuru Milk Producers Co. Operative Society Ltd. Vs the Assistant Registrar of Co-Operative Societies

M/S Mint Properties Vs M/S the Nilgiri Dairy Farm Pvt. Ltd.

Sri. B. M. Thontadarya Vs the Joint Registrar of Co. Operative Societies

Schenker India Private Limited Vs M/S Lapp India Private Limited

Mr. T.H. Krishnappa Vs M/S Metal Closures Pvt. Ltd.

Sri C Shivashankar Vs the Official Liquidator of