Allowed

M/S Zuari Infraworld India Limited v. M/S Mandya National Paper Mills

Karnataka HC15 Feb 2023CA/408/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Karnataka, by Krishna S Dixit, favored an application under Company Court Rules 1959 and CPC to implead additional respondents (Tahsildar & Block Education Officer) as Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 in underlying proceedings, citing no prejudice.

What did the court decide?

Application in CA No.408/2022 favored; Applicant directed to implead proposed applicants as Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 to CA No.253/2018.

M/S Zuari Infraworld India Limited Vs M/S Mandya… — Company and Corporate | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

1 - CA NO. 408/2022 IN CA NO.253/2018 IN COP NO.112/1994

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 15^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT

¶6

CA NO.408/2022 IN CA NO.253/2018 IN COP NO.112/1994

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

M/S ZUARI INFRAWORLD INDIA LIMITED., ZUARI GARDEN CITY, HULIKERE, SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER/ PROJECT IN CHARGE SRI SRINIVAS.

¶9

…APPLICANT

¶10

(BY SRI. THOMAS V PETER.,ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

Digitally signed by CHETAN B C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

M/S MANDYA NATIONAL PAPER MILLS., REPRESENTED BY THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, 12^TH FLOOR, RAHEJA TOWERS, M G ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001.

¶14

…RESPONDENT

¶15

(BY SRI.K S MAHADEVAN.,ADVOCATE FOR OL)

¶16

THIS APPLICATION IS FILED UNDER RULE 6 & 9 OF THE COMPANY COURT RULES 1959 R/W ORDER 6 RULE 17 OF CPC, PRAYING TO PLEASED TO IMPLEAD THE AFORE MENTIONED PARTIES AS RESPONDENT NO.2 AND 3 TO THESE PROCEEDINGS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

¶17

THIS APPLICATION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶18

2 - CA NO. 408/2022 IN CA NO.253/2018 IN COP NO.112/1994

¶19

ORDER

¶20

The Application in CA No.408/2022 supported by an Affidavit seeks impleadment of proposed ApplicantsTahsildar & Block Education Officer as the Respondents. The accompanying Application in CA No.402/2022 having been favoured, leave to amending the prayer having been granted, the subject Application for impleadment needs to be favoured to make the amendment now allowed meaningful. No prejudice would be caused to anyone by said impleadment.

¶21

In view of the above, the Application in CA No.408/2022 is favoured; the Applicant is directed to implead the proposed impleading Applicants as Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 to CA No.253/2018.

¶22

Applicant to amend the Cause Title.

¶23

Learned HCGP is requested to accept notice for

¶24

Respondent Nos. 2 & 3.

¶25

Bsv

¶26

Sd/JUDGE

M/S Zuari Infraworld India Limited v. M/S Mandya National Paper Mills

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Zuari Infraworld India Limited v. M/S Mandya National Paper Mills

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M Katappa Vs the State of Karnataka

C Krishnappa Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt B Uma Vs the State of Karnataka

Mangal D Karnad Vs Negf Ltd.

M/S Zuari Infraworld India Limited Vs M/S Mandya National Paper Mills

Sri Somashekar N Vs the State of Karnataka