Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioner, via memo, sought permission to withdraw the petition and reserve liberty to file a fresh one, which was accepted.
Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition before the appropriate court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF JULY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S. SANJAY GOWDA
WRIT PETITION NO.928 OF 2022 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
M/S. ADARSHA POLUTRY FARM NEAR RAILWAY CHINTALAMADIVALA, HUSKUR POST, ANEKAL TALUK.
REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI. C.M. LAKSHMANA MURTHY S/O MUNIVENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS NO.61, NEAR FRUIT MARKET, CHINTALAMADIVALA, HUSKUR, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 099.
…..PETITIONER
(BY SRI. H. MAREGOWDA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
2
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. R. SRINIVASA GOWDA, AGA FOR R1 AND 2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.2-TAHASILDAR, ANEKAL TALUK TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 28TH DECEMBER, 2021 VIDE ANNEXURE-H FILED BY THE PETITIONER AND NOT TO PROCEED FURTHER WITH ANNEXURE-A; AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Memo is filed seeking permission to withdraw the petition reserving liberty to file a fresh petition before the appropriate Court. Memo is taken on record and accepted.
Writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn reserving
liberty as sought for.
Sd/JUDGE
ARK
M/s. Adarsha Polutry Farm
The State of Karnataka
N.S. Sanjay Gowda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
