Disposed

Sri R Somashekar v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC9 Nov 2022WP/786/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court restored the interim order in an appeal pending before the respondent-authority regarding land measurement (phodi) work in Survey No. 88. The application was directed to re-accomplish the work after giving notice to all stakeholders within three months. The writ petition was disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Restoration of the interim order and direction to re-accomplish phodi work in Sy.No.88 after notice to stakeholders within three months.

Sri R Somashekar Vs the State of Karnataka — Land Acquisition | Karnataka HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022

¶3

BEFORE

¶4

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.786 OF 2022 (KLR - RES)

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

SRI. R. SOMASHEKAR, S/O LATE RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT SRINIVASAPURA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT – 562 123.

¶8

ALSO AT: NO.223, “SHREE RAMA DHAMA”, 1^ST CROSS, 3^RD BLOCK, NAGARABHAVI 2^ND STAGE, BENGALURU – 560 072.

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI.CHANDRACHUD A., ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU – 560 001.

¶13

¶14

TECHNICAL ASSISTANT FOR DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF THE LAND RECORDS, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFFICE, DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE BHAVANA, 1^ST FLOOR, BEERASANDRA GRAMA, KUNDANAHALLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK – 562 110.

¶15

THE TAHSILDAR, NELAMANGALA TALUK, NELAMANGALA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT – 562 123.

¶16

THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, NELAMANGALA TALUK, NELAMANGALA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT – 562 123.

¶17

SMT. MANGALAGOWRAMMA, W/O LT VENKATARAMAIAH @ RAJANNA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT NO.18, 1^ST CROSS, HARISHINAKUNTE, OPP. AGANAVADI CENTRE, NELAMANGALA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT – 562 123.

¶18

SRI. SHIVARAJ, S/O LATE VENKATARAMAIAH @ RAJANNA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/AT NO.18, 1^ST CROSS, HARISHINAKUNTE, OPP. AGANAVADI CENTRE, NELAMANGALA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT – 562 123.

¶19

¶20

SRI. SHASHIKUMAR, S/O LT VENKATARAMAIAH @ RAJANNA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT NO.18, 1^ST CROSS, HARISHINAKUNTE, OPP. AGANAVADI CENTRE, NELAMANGALA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT – 562 123.

¶21

SRI. GANGAIAH, S/O SRI. ARASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT HANUMANTHEGOWDANA PALYA, ENTAGANAHALLI POST, KASABA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT – 562 123.

¶22

SMT. PUTTAGANGAMMA, C/O SRI. NANJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT DODDABELEKERE, SHIVAKOTE POST, HESSARGHATTA MAIN ROAD, YELAHANKA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT – 560 089.

¶23

SMT. G.A. REKHA CHANDRASHEKAR, W/O K.V. CHANDRA SHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, R/AT NO.38, 17^TH CROSS, NEAR MEWS HOSTEL, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU – 560 055.

¶24

SRI.B.V.NARASIMHAMURTHY, C/O SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT SRINIVASAPURA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI,

¶25

¶26

NELAMANGALA , BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT – 562 123.

¶27

ALSO AT: NO.2584, 11^TH MAIN ROAD, ‘E’ BLOCK, 2^ND STAGE, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 010.

¶28

…RESPONDENTS

¶29

(BY SRI.R.SRINIVASA GOWDA, AGA FOR R1 – R4; SRI.D.R.RAVISHANKAR, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI.LAKSHA B KALAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R10; R5 AND R7 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED; NOTICE TO R11 IS DISPENSED WITH VIDE ORDER DATED 17.06.2022)

¶30

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 17.12.2021 PASSED BY THE R-2 VACATING THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 10.11.2021 VIDE ANNEXURE - A AND ETC.,

¶31

THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶32

ORDER

¶33

Both the sides having argued the matter vociferously for some time, now agree that the interim order that was in force in the appeal pending before the answering Respondent be restored and that entire phodi work pertaining to land in Sy.No.88 be re-accomplished after

¶34

¶35

notice to all the stake holders in accordance with law. All

¶36

contentions are kept open.

¶37

Ordered accordingly & Writ Petition is disposed off.

¶38

This exercise shall be accomplished preferably within a period of three months.

¶39

Sd/JUDGE

¶40

Sri R Somashekar v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri R Somashekar v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Rathnamma Vs Special Deputy Commissioner

L. Nagaraju Vs the Tahsildar

Sri K R Rajesh Vs the Deputy Commisioner

Smt. Aswathamma Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Venkateshappa Vs State of Karnataka

Sri Govinda Shetty Vs the State of Karnataka