Writ petition filed to quash a notice issued by a respondent. The court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn based on a memo filed by the petitioner's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
WRIT PETITION NO.6604 OF 2019 (LB-BMP)
BETWEEN:
M/S INDUS TOWERS LTD NO.12, TOWER-D, 7TH FLOOR, SUBRAMANYA ARCADE, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BANGALORE-29, REP BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, SRI AZEEZ K.A.
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI ROHITH B J, ADVOCATE)
AND:
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI M C NAGASHREE, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTICE DATED 21.01.2019 ISSUED BY THE R-2 WHICH IS PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-D AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
2
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition.
Memo is taken on record.
In view of the memo filed, writ petition is
dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
BS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S Indus Towers Ltd
The Commissioner BBMP
The Assistant Executive Engineer Vidyaranya Vapura Sub Division
Hemant Chandangoudar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
