Mr H K Srinath v. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought writ relief against termination of his petroleum dealership license and sought restoration of lease. Court did not pronounce on merits due to delay, directing respondents to consider a fresh representation.
What did the court decide?
Disposed; liberty given to file further representation for redressal.
What the court decided
- 1 -
WP No. 6437 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 6437 OF 2019 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
MR.H.K.SRINATH S/O S.KRISHNAMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, PROPRIETOR, SRI MYLARALINGESHWARA SERVICE STATION, R/AT NO.918, 4TH MAIN, NEW KANTHARAJ URS ROAD, SARASWATHIPURAM MYSURU – 570 009.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. G.B.SHARATH GOWDA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by 1. BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD., PADMAVATHI B K A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER Location: HIGH COURT OF THE INDIAN COMPANIES ACT, 1956 KARNATAKA GOVERNMENT OF INDIA UNDERTAKING HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT BHARAT BHAVAN, 4 & 6, CURRIMBHOY ROAD, BALLARD ESTATE, MUMBAI REPRESENTED BY ITS
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to restoration of his petroleum dealership termination.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mr. H.K. Srinath
- respondent
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
- respondent
Government of India
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/6437/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court