Sri M S Harish v. Smt. Shubhamangala
Case brief
What is this about?
petitioner withdrew the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India; petition disposed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 -
WP No. 6291 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 6291 OF 2021 (GM-FC)
BETWEEN:
SRI M.S.HARISH S/O K.N.SUBBA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/AT: D.NO.46 SRI LAKSHMI JANARDHAN TEMPLE ROAD, OLD TOWN MANDYA TOWN – 571 401.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI.LEELADHAR H.P., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by PADMAVATHI B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sri M.S. Harish
- respondent
Smt. Shubhamangala
Coram
M. NagarPrashanna
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/6291/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court