Disposed

Sri M K Munikrishnappa v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC12 Aug 2022WP/6009/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Karnataka disposed of two connected writ petitions filed by a petitioner seeking mutation of land. The Court noted that the petitioner's name was entered in the Revenue Record of Rights (RTC), directing the Tahsildar to remove the stay note and issue a fresh RTC.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondent Tahsildar to remove the stay note from RTC and issue a fresh certified copy.

Sri M K Munikrishnappa Vs State of Karnataka — Property and Title | Karnataka HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

WP No. 6009 of 2020

¶3

C/W WP No. 6094 of 2020

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 12^TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2022

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO. 6009 OF 2020 (KLR-RES)

¶9

C/W

¶10

WRIT PETITION NO. 6094 OF 2020 (KLR-RES)

¶11

In W.P.No.6009/2020

¶12

BETWEEN:

¶13

Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

SRI M K MUNIKRISHNAPPA S/O LATE M.KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS NO.99, KSFC LAYOUT, OIL MILL ROAD, LINGARAJAPURAM, BANGALORE-560084 (ADHAR CARD PRODUCED)

¶15

…PETITIONER

¶16

(BY SRI. AMARESH A ANGADI, ADVOCATE)

¶17

AND:

¶18

STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001 BY ITS SECREATARY

¶19

THE SPECIAL TAHSILDHAR BANGALORE EAST TALUK K.R.PURAM BANGALORE-560036.

¶20

THE TAHSILDHAR BANGALORE EAST TALUK

¶21

¶22

WP No. 6009 of 2020 C/W WP No. 6094 of 2020

¶23

K.R.PURAM BANGALORE-560036.

¶24

…RESPONDENTS

¶25

(BY SRI. SESHU V., HCGP)

¶26

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS, IN DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3 TO MUTATE THE KHATHA OF THE PETITIONER'S LAND BEARING SURVEY NO.112, MEASURING 1-00 ACRE, SITUATED AT ADUR VILLAGE, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER INCLUDING THE PAHANI OF THE SAID LAND IN PURSUANCE OF THE REPRESENTATION MADE BY THE PETITIONER DATED 31-12020 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AS PER THE VARIOUS ORDERS OF THIS HON'BLE COURT, JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE HON'BLE 2ND ADDL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BANGALORE IN O.S.NO.1421/2007 DATED 04.09.2017 AT ANNEXURE- B AND ORDERS PASSED BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AND DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE AND ETC.

¶27

In W.P.No.6094/2020

¶28

BETWEEN:

¶29

SRI M K MUNIKRISHNAPPA S/O LATE M.KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS

¶30

¶31

WP No. 6009 of 2020 C/W WP No. 6094 of 2020

¶32

NO.99, KSFC LAYOUT, OIL MILL ROAD, LINGARAJAPURAM, BANGALORE-560084 (ADHAR CARD PRODUCED)

¶33

…PETITIONER

¶34

(BY SRI. AMARESH A ANGADI, ADVOCATE)

¶35

AND:

¶36

STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001 BY ITS SECREATARY

¶37

THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER-1, BANGALORE NORTH SUB-DIVISION-1 KANDAYA BHAVAN BANGALORE - 560 009.

¶38

THE TAHSILDHAR BANGALORE EAST TALUK K.R.PURAM BANGALORE-560036.

¶39

THE SPECIAL TAHSILDHAR BANGALORE EAST TALUK K.R.PURAM BANGALORE - 560 036.

¶40

JAYARAM S/O LATE OF D.NANJUNDAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS ADUR VILLAGE BIDARAHALLI HOBLI VIRGO NAGAR POST BENGALURU - 560 049

¶41

…RESPONDENTS

¶42

(BY SRI. SESHU V., HCGP FOR R-1 TO R-4; SRI.M.JAI PRAKASH REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R-5)

¶43

¶44

WP No. 6009 of 2020 C/W WP No. 6094 of 2020

¶45

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI IN QUASHING THE IMPUGNED NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT-SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER-1, BANGALORE NORTH SUB-DIVISION, KANDAYA BHAVAN, BANGALORE IN NO.RRT/(E)CR.13/19-20 DATED 5-3-2020 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.

¶46

THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶47

ORDER

¶48

R.DEVDAS J., (ORAL):

¶49

Learned High Court Government Pleader has filed a memo dated 12.08.2022 along with latest RTC extract of the year 2022-23 in respect of Sy.No.112 of Adur village, Bidarahalli Hobli, Bengaluru East Taluk.

¶50

Learned HCGP submits that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed since his name has been entered in the RTC in respect of one acre of land.

¶51

However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the name of the petitioner has been

¶52

¶53

WP No. 6009 of 2020

¶54

C/W WP No. 6094 of 2020

¶55

entered in the RTC, however, in column No.11 in the RTC, the order of stay granted by the Deputy Commissioner continuous to be reflected.

¶56

Consequently, these writ petitions stand disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3-Tahsildar, Bengaluru East Taluk, K.R.Puram, to remove the note in column No.11 pertaining to the order of stay in R.P.No.347/2018 dated 18.12.2018 forthwith and issue a

¶57

fresh certified copy of the RTC to the petitioner.

¶58

Accordingly, these writ petitions stand disposed of.

¶59

Sd/JUDGE

¶60

GPG

Sri M K Munikrishnappa v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri M K Munikrishnappa v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G.R. Eashwarappa Vs the State of Karnataka

Mohammad Ibrahim Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri. Sandeep Puri Vs State of Karnataka

V Narasimhaiah Vs State of Karnataka

Sri K Veerabhadrachari Vs the State of Karnataka

Abhimanyu Mani P Vs the State of Karnataka