Petitioner sought to quash an order and allow an application under the Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act. Court disposed of the writ petition as the underlying dispute was amicably settled at Lok Adalat.
Writ petition disposed of in view of settlement arrived at between the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
W.P. NO. 5835/2016 (LB-BMP)
BETWEEN:
S Parthasarathi s/o late Shamanna aged about 47 years R/o 153/3, 14th A Cross Yelamma Temple Road Nagavarapallya C V Raman Nagar Post Bangalore-560093. ... Petitioner (By Sri Sachin B S, Advocate through V/C)
AND:
2
This writ petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the order dated 27.12.2014 issued by the respondent No.1 as per Annexure-A and consequently allow the application dated 3.12.2013 filed by the petitioner under Section 114 of Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act, 1976.
This petition coming on for preliminary hearing 'B' group, this day, the Court delivered the following:
ORDER
Learned counsel for respondent no.3 has filed a memo stating that the parties have amicably settled the dispute before Lok Adalat in O.S. No.6956/2013.
parties, this petition does not survive for consideration and accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/JUDGE
vgh*
S Parthasarathi
Assistant Revenue Officer C V Ramannagar
Bruhath Bangalore Mahanagara Palike
S Ramesh
Hemant Chandangoudar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
