Petitioners sought a writ under Article 226 for a certified copy of an award. The petitioners filed a memo seeking to withdraw the petition, which the court permitted, resulting in the dismissal of the writ petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE Mrs. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
WRIT PETITION No. 55310/2018 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN :
(By Sri. A. Mahesh Chowdhary, Adv.)
AND :
2
===
This writ petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India with a prayer to direct respondent No. 2 to grant a certified copy of the award dated 10.03.2004 in Execution No. 3233/2014 on the file of XIX Additional City Civil and Sessions Court, Bangalore (CCH-18) vide Annexure A and etc.
This writ petition coming on for Orders this day, the Court passed the following;
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a
memo for withdrawal of the petition which reads as under:
“The counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Hon’ble Court to withdraw the petition. The memo for withdrawal may be placed on record in the interest of justice and equity.”
3
memo, petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE.
LRS.
Pritpal Singh
Mrs. Ravindar Kaur
The Registrar City Civil Court Bangalore
M/s. Sundaram Finance
K.S. Hemalekha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
