Dismissed

Smt Sujitha Rai v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC5 Sept 2022WP/51406/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed the withdrawal of a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, which sought to quash criminal proceedings in a police case involving the petitioner, dismissing the petition as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition if a charge sheet is filed.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition if the charge sheet is filed.

Smt Sujitha Rai Vs the State of Karnataka — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Karnataka HC (2022)

¶1

1 - WP No. 51406 of 2017

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 5^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 51406 OF 2017 (GM-RES)

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

SMT SUJITHA RAI W/O SANDEEP AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, MEMBER AND AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY M/S NEW MEMBERS LOUNGE SKILL CLUB PAILAND PLAZA FALNIR ROAD ATTAVARA MANGALORE-575021

¶8

…PETITIONER

¶9

(BY SRI. ROSHAN H.C., ADVOCATE)

¶10

Digitally signed by POORNIMA SHIVANNA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶11

AND:

¶12

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560 001

¶13

THE DIRECTOR GENERAL AND INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE POLICE HEAD QUARTERS

¶14

2 - WP No. 51406 of 2017

¶15

NRUPATHUNGA ROAD

¶16

BANGALORE-560 001

¶17

T R SURESH THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE POLICE COMMISIONERATE PANDESHWAR MANGALORE-575001

¶18

SRI K U BELLIAPPA THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MANGALORE SOUTH POLICE STATION, NEAR FORUM MALL PANDESHWARA MANGALORE-575001

¶19

SMT KAVITHA SANIL MAYOR MANGALORE CITY CORPORATION MANGALORE-5745012

¶20

SRI A MANJAIAH SHETTY HEALTH OFFICER MANGALORE CITY CORPORATION M G ROAD LALBHAGH MANGALORE-575012

¶21

…RESPONDENTS

¶22

(BY SRI. MAHESH SHETTY, HCGP FOR R1 TO R4)

¶23

THIS WP FILED PRAYING TO UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA TO DECLARE THAT IMPLICATING THE PETITIONER IN CRIME NO. 183/2017 AT ANNEX-C OF MANGALORE SOUTH POLICE STATION FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SEC. 143, 147, 353, 448, 427 R/W SEC. 149 OF IPC, IS CONTRARY TO THE LAW LAID DOWN

¶24

¶25

WP No. 51406 of 2017

¶26

BY THIS HON'BLE COURT AND WITHOUT THE AUTHORITY OF LAW; QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN CRIME NO. 183/2017 AT ANNEX-C OF MANGALORE SOUTH POLICE STATION PENDING IN THE FILE OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS 2ND COURT, REGISTERED FOR OFFENCES UNDER SEC. 143, 147, 353, 448, 427, 149 OF IPC ETC.

¶27

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶28

ORDER

¶29

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo for withdrawal dated 05.09.2022 seeking permission to withdraw the above matter with liberty to file a fresh petition, if the charge sheet is filed.

¶30

Reserving liberty, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶31

Sd/JUDGE

¶32

BVK

¶33

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36

Smt Sujitha Rai v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Sujitha Rai v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D K Malleshappa Vs the Divisional Controller

Nirmala @ Basalingavva Vs the Managing Director

N. Nagaraj Vs the Divisional Controller

Mr. M N Devaraju Vs State of Karnataka

Sri S a Puttaraju Vs Smt Bhagyamma

Smt Rekha Prasad Vs State Represented by