The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution concerning tax calculation was disposed of having abated. The High Court noted that sufficient time was granted to bring the legal representatives of the petitioner, but they did not appear, leading to the abatement of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE R.NATARAJ
WRIT PETITION NO.5070 OF 2019 (LB - TAX)
BETWEEN:
C. BALAKRISHNA, S/O LATE B N CHANNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, NRUPATHUNGA EXTENSION, TUMAKURU DISTRICT, TUMAKURU.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI.K.SREEDHAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.S.N.PRASHANTH CHANDRA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CALCULATE THE TAX PAYABLE BY THE PETITIONER CORRECTLY AND GIVE THE EVIDENCE FOR
2
MAKING SUCH AN EXORBITANT CLAIM IN THE NOTICE AS PER ANNEXUER - E DATED 1.2.2017 PASSED BY THE R-2 AND PERMIT THE PETITIONER TO PAY THE REVISED TAX IN INSTALMENTS AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Though sufficient time was granted to take steps to
bring the legal representatives of the petitioner, the same has not been done.
2. Hence, this writ petition is disposed as
having abated .
Sd/JUDGE
NR/-
C. BALAKRISHNA
THE BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE (BBMP)
THE ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER, BBMP
R. NATARAJ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
