A petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India to quash a notification dated 29.10.2015. The High Court of Karnataka disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT
WRIT PETITION NO.50543 OF 2015 (GM-R/C)
BETWEEN:
SRI KODAMANTHAYA DAIVASTHANA YEKKAR MANGALORE TALUK
REP. BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE, MR. NITHIN HEGDE @ DURGA PRASAD SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI.UDAYA PRAKASH.M, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPT. OF HINDU RELIGIOUS ENDOWMENT AND CHARITABLE INSTITUTIONS, VIKASA SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR AVEEDHI, BANGALORE 560001
HINDU RELIGIOUS AND ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT, DISTRICT DHARMIKA PARISHAD, DAKSHINA KANNADA, MANGALORE
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. RASHMI PATEL, HCGP FOR R1 & R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION DT.29.10.2015 VIDE ANNX-F SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO THE PETITIONER.AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
2
ORDER
This petition is disposed off as withdrawn in terms of
the Memo dated 14.02.2018, which reads as under:
" The petitioner above-named does not wish to prosecute the above case. Therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw the above writ petition, in the interest of justice and equity."
Sd/JUDGE
DS
Sri Kodamantahaya Daivasthana Yekkar Mangalore Taluk
The State of Karnataka
The Deputy Commissioner
Krishna S. Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
