Dismissed

Sri Manukuppe Chikkavenkataiah v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC1 Apr 2022WP/4889/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court recalled a previous one-day order due to procedural irregularities and lack of consideration. Upon hearing the petitioner's counsel regarding errors in the writ petition number and status of a related petition, the petitioner filed a memo for leave to withdraw. The court granted leave and disposed of the petition accordingly.

What the court decided

AI extract

Sri Manukuppe Chikkavenkataiah Vs State of Karnataka — GST and Indirect Tax | Karnataka HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶2

DATED THIS THE 1^ST DAY OF APRIL 2022

¶3

BEFORE

¶4

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B. M. SHYAM PRASAD

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.4889/2022 (T-RES)

¶6

BETWEEN :

¶7

SRI MANUKUPPE CHIKKAVENKATAIAH SRINIVASAIAH (PROPRIETOR) M/S SRI GIRI BAR AND RESTAURANT S/O SRI CHIKKAVENKATAIAH AGED 55 YEARS NO 20, HMT MAIN ROAD SBM COLONY, MATHIKERE BANGALORE – 560 054.

¶8

... PETITIONER

¶9

(BY SRI. ATUL KRISHNA RAO ALUR, ADVOCATE)

¶10

AND :

¶11

STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS FINANCE SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA VIDHANA SOUDHA AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU – 560 001.

¶12

THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (KGST) VANIJYA THERIGE BHVAN GANDHINAGARA BENGALURU – 560 009.

¶13

¶14

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (AUDIT) 6, 1-DVO-6 14^TH CROSS, PEENYA II STAGE BENGALURU – 560 058.

¶15

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE BUD-1, BANGAORE DIST (NORTH), NO 26/4B, 3^RD FLOOR INDUSTRIAL SUBURB SANDAL WOOD SOAP FACTORY NEAR BMRCL WEST OF CHORD ROAD 2^ND STAGE, RAJAJINAGARA BENGALURU – 560 010.

¶16

... RESPONDENTS

¶17

(BY SRI.K. HEMAKUMAR, AGA)

¶18

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OF R-3 BEARING NO.ACCT (AUDIT)-6.1/DVO06/2021-22 DATED 07.02.2022 ISSUED TO ICICI BANK, MSRE ROAD, NO.21, 1^ST CROSS ROAD, MATHIKERE, BENGALURU-560054 ATTACHING THE BANK ACCOUNTS OF THE PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF ACCOUNTS MAINTAINED BY THE PETITIONER VIDE ANNX-; QUASH THE ORDER OF R-3 BEARING NO. ACCT(AUDIT) 6.1/DVO06/2021-22, DATED 07.02.2022 ISSUED TO UNION BANK OF INDIA, NO.71, 1 BRIGADE PLAZA, SUBEDAR CHASTRAM ROAD (SC ROAD), BENGALURU 560009, ATTACHING THE BANK ACCOUNT NO.520101067096243 AND 510101002834544 MAINTAINED BY THE PETITIONER VIDE ANNX-C1; QUASH THE ORDER OF R-3 BEARING NO. ACCT (AUDIT) -6.1/DVO-06/2021-22, DATED 07.02.2022 ISSUED TO THE STATE BANK OF INDIA, MS RAMAIAH RD, GOKULA 1^ST STAGE, HMT LAYOUT, MATHIKERE, BENGALURU 560054 ATTACHING THE BANK ACCOUNT NO.64013914016-CIN RESPECT OF ALL BANK ACCOUNTS MAINTAINED SRI MANIKUPPE CHIKKAVENKATAIAH SRINIVASAIAH (PROPRIETOR) OF SRI GIRI BAR AND

¶19

¶20

RESTAURANT, NO.20 HMT MAIN ROAD, SBM COLONY, MATHIKERE, BANGALORE 560054 VIDE ANNX-C2. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-

¶21

O R D E R

¶22

This Court had disposed of this writ petition on 17.03.2022 and is re-listed again on 29.03.2022 because of certain clarifications that were required. It was submitted that the writ petition in W.P. No.2859/2021 was disposed of and the certified copy was awaited. It is again listed today because it was pointed out by the office that this writ petition is pending consideration.

¶23

The learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Atul Krishna Rao Alur, files a memo for leave to withdraw the writ petition stating that there is an error in mentioning the writ petition number and also in stating that the writ petition in W.P. No.2859/2021 is disposed of. Therefore, while recalling the earlier order dated

¶24

¶25

29.03.2022, the petition stands disposed of as

¶26

withdrawn in consideration of the memo that is taken

¶27

on record.

¶28

Sd/JUDGE

¶29

AN/-

Sri Manukuppe Chikkavenkataiah v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Sri Manukuppe Chikkavenkataiah v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Tra and Company Vs Additional Chief Secretary to Government

M/S. Abhiram Infra Projects Private Limited Vs the Commissioner

Etisalat Software Solutions Private Limited Vs the Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax/Income Tax Officer

Smt Rathnamma Vs the Assistant Commissioner

M/S. Sri Giri Bar and Restaurant Vs State of Karnataka

M/S Yojaka (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs the Asst Commissioner of Income-Tax