Dismissed

Nandeesh Chikkanna v. M/S. Magma Fincorp Limited

Karnataka HC15 Feb 2022WP/48582/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner under Articles 226, 227 of the Constitution and Section 482 CrPC as withdrawn. The court permitted the petitioner to withdraw a deposited sum subject to identification.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to withdraw deposited amount of Rs. 1,47,804/- subject to furnishing proper identification.

Nandeesh Chikkanna Vs M/S. Magma Fincorp… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Karnataka HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶2

DATED THIS THE 15^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022

¶3

BEFORE

¶4

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.48582 OF 2016 (GM-RES)

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

NANDEESH CHIKKANNA, S/O. CHIKKANNA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, PERMANENT RESIDENT OF NO.165, SFS YELAHANKA, NEW TOWN, BANGALORE - 560 064. … PETITIONER

¶8

(BY SRI VIJAYA KUMAR BHAT A., ADVOCATE)

¶9

AND:

¶10

M/S. MAGMA FINCORP LIMITED, "MAGMA HOUSE", 24, PARK STREET, KOLKATA - 700 016, WEST BENGAL STATE, HAS ITS OFFICE

¶11

AT BENGALURU ALSO AT THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:-

¶12

M/S. MAGMA FINCORP LIMITED, 2^ND AND 3^RD FLOOR, HM TOWERS, J.C. ROAD, NEAR MINERVA CIRCLE, BANGALORE - 560 002,

¶13

REPRESENTED BY THEIR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, RAJESH LASKAR. ...RESPONDENT

¶14

-:2:-

¶15

(BY SRI. M.V. SRIDHAR CHAKRAVARTHI, ADVOCATE)

¶16

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 482 OF CPC., PRAYING TO QUASH ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN CASE NO.CS/0400461/14 ON THE FILE OF 11^TH METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, KOLKATA, VIDE ANNEXURE-T, AND ETC.

¶17

THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner after arguing the matter for some time seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the petition reserving liberty to challenge the order impugned herein before the appropriate Court. He further submits that the amount deposited by the petitioner in pursuance of the order dated 15.09.2016 may be released in favour of the petitioner.

¶20

The aforesaid submission is placed on record.

¶21

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn

¶22

reserving liberty as sought for. The petitioner is permitted to withdraw the amount of Rs.1,47,804/- deposited before this

¶23

-:3:-

¶24

Court in pursuance of the order dated 15.09.2016 subject to furnishing of proper identification.

¶25

Sd/JUDGE

¶26

Nandeesh Chikkanna v. M/S. Magma Fincorp Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nandeesh Chikkanna v. M/S. Magma Fincorp Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Shruthi Y Vs the Commissioner

G Aswathamma Vs State of Karnataka

L Govindraj Vs the Chief Commissioner

Sri Swamy R T Vs State by Santhebennur P.S.

Sri Dinesh Shetty Vs the Station House Officer

Sri Mircle Varadaraju Vs State of Karnataka