Upon supporting counsel's submission that the underlying civil suit was disposed of, this court rejected the writ petition as infructuous and dismissed the same.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF MAY 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI
WRIT PETITION NO.48552 OF 2016 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
M. SHAMSHU KHAN @ M. SHAMSHU SAB, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, S/O MADAR KHAN, R/O MUSKAM ‘B’ BLOCK, ANDERSONPET POST, KOLAR GOLD FIELDS, KOLAR DISTRICT – 563 114.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. UDHAYA KUMAR G., ADVOCATE)
AND:
K. GAJENDRA, S/O M. KRISHNAN, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O No.8, NEW MODEL HOUSE, BAND LINE, OORGAUM POST, KOLAR GOLD FIELD, KOLAR DISTRICT.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. J.G. CHANDRAMOHAN, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH
2
ANNEX-A THE ORDER DATED 26.04.2016 MADE ON M.A.NO.86/2015 PASSED BY THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC, KGF AND CONFIRM THE ORDER DATED 03.11.2015 PASSED ON I.A.NO.2 IN O.S.NO.156/2012 PASSED BY THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC COURT AT K.G.F., AS PER ANNEXURE-F.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
This writ petition is arising out of an order passed in O.S.No.156/2012. Learned counsel appearing for respondent submits that, the suit in O.S.No.156/2012 came to be disposed of on 13.04.2022.
SD/JUDGE
GRD
M. Shamsu Khan
K. Gajendra
Ashok S. Kinagi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
