The petitioners failure to appear resulted in the dismissal of this writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for non-prosecution.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
WRIT PETITION No.42495/2019 (GM-TEN)
BETWEEN:
SMT. V. ANUPAMA W/O. S. SIDDESWARA KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, PROP: AVS ADVERTISERS, NO.398, 4TH CROSS, RMV 2ND BLOCK, 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU – 560 094. ... PETITIONER
(BY SRI. V.B. SHIVA KUMAR, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
(BY SRI P.D. SURANA, ADVOCATE FOR R-1 & R-2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE COMMUNICATION BEARING NO.KST/KBS/W1/563/2019-20 DATED 27.08.2019 ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R
There is no representation on behalf of the
petitioner.
the petition has not become infructuous, it is always open
for the petitioner to revive the writ petition by filing necessary application.
I.A.No.2/2019 does not survive for consideration.
SD/JUDGE
S*
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non-prosecution in the absence of the petitioner.
Whether the writ petition has become infructuous due to issuance of a fresh tender notification.
Smt. V. Anupama
The Managing Director, KSRTC
The Divisional Controller, KSRTC
K.S. HEMALEKHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
