Dismissed
Lokesha v. Eregowda
Karnataka HCWP/4118/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court of Karnataka dismissed this writ petition filed under Article 226 as it had become infructuous due to an amicable settlement reached by the parties at the Lok Adalat on March 12, 2022.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
¶2
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF APRIL, 2022
¶3
BEFORE
¶4
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH
¶5
WRIT PETITION NO.4118 OF 2019 (GM-CPC)
¶6
BETWEEN:
¶7
- LOKESHA S/O CHANDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS.
¶8
- SAKAMMA W/O LOKESHA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS.
¶9
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT DEVARANARASIPURA VILLAGE, KUDLIGERE HOBLI, BHADRAVATHI TALUK-577 301.
¶10
...PETITIONERS
¶11
(BY SRI. S.N. BHAT, ADVOCATE)
¶12
AND:
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Lokesha S/o Chandruppa
- petitioner
Sakamma W/o Lokesha
- respondent
Eregowda S/o Yellegowda
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/4118/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court