Petitioner sought withdrawal of the writ petition under Articles 226, 226 and 227 of the Constitution and Section 482 of Cr.P.C. The Court dismissed the petition because it was withdrawn after out-of-court settlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF APRIL, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION No.4110/2022 (GM – RES)
BETWEEN
AJAY CHOPRA, S/O SURESH KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, R/A WARD NO.6, MOHALLA, SARFAN, RAHON, NAWANSHAR, PUNJAB – 144 517.
... PETITIONER
[BY SRI.ASHWIN KUMAR H., ADVOCATE]
AND
... RESPONDENTS
[BY SMT.YASHODA K.P., HCGP FOR R1]
2
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS IN CR.NO.225/2021 OF NAGAMANGALA RURAL POLICE STATION, PENDING BEFORE THE COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NAGAMANGALA, MANDYA DISTRICT KARNATAKA AS PER ANNEXURE – A AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner files a memo seeking to withdraw the petition on the score that the matter has been settled out of the Court.
Memo is placed on record.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
SJK
Ajay Chopra
State
Sri. Sumanth P.
M. Nagaprasanna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
