The High Court of Karnataka disposed of Writ Petition No. 40529 of 2017 as infructuous. The Court noted that since the Trial Court had already passed a final order forming a Trust Scheme, the petitioners' objective was achieved, leaving nothing for consideration.
The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE Dr. JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
WRIT PETITION No.40529 OF 2017 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
W.P.No.40529/2017
2
..Petitioners (By Sri. M. Arun Ponnappa, Advocate)
AND:
(By Sri.Shishira Amarnath, Advocate for R-1; Respondent No.2 - Served)
This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Certiorari or any other Writ, order or direction and allow the above Writ Petition and set aside/quash the impugned order Annexure-“C” dated 09.03.2017, passed by the IIIrd Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Mysore in O.S.No.04/2009, in the interest of justice and equity.
W.P.No.40529/2017
3
This Writ Petition coming on for Preliminary Hearing in ‘B’ Group, through Physical Hearing/Video Conferencing Hearing, this day, the Court made the following:
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioners who is physically present, has filed a memo, stating that in view of the Trial Court passing a final order, forming a Scheme for smooth functioning of the Trust, the objective of the writ petition has stood achieved and as such, nothing survives for consideration.
In view of the memo and the supporting submission, the writ petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
BMV*
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives for consideration after the formation of a scheme by the Trial Court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Maistry Thimmaiachar Choultry Trust
Mr. M.T. Ramachandra
Mr. S.B. Arunachala
Mr. H. Vittal
Mr. T.N. Manjunatha
Mr. M.T. Nagaraj
Dr. Justice H.B. Prabhakar Sastry
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
