The High Court of Karnataka disposed of a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a direction to the police not to harass petitioners or interfere with their financial transactions involving other parties. The Bail/A.G.A. submitted the police would not interfere without complaint. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT
WRIT PETITION NO.3140/2020 (GM-POLICE)
BETWEEN:
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.204, ASPEN GOLD APARTMENT ROYAL SHELTER 1ST STAGE OPP: ELINA APARTMENT DEVARACHIKKANAHALLI IIM POST BENGALURU-560 076.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI SHASHIDHAR BELAGUMBA, ADV.)
AND:
2
RESPONDENTS 2 & 3 ARE R/O NO.25, 10TH ‘A’ MAIN VIRATNAGAR BOMMANAHALLI BENGALURU-560 068.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI M VINOD KUMAR, AGA FOR R1 SRI SYED KHAMRUDDIN, ADV. FOR R2 & R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R1 NOT TO HARASS THE PETITIONERS AND NOT TO INTERFERE WITH THE PETITIONERS AND R2 AND 3 BUSINESS ISSUE AND MONEY TRANSACTION.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER
Heard Sri.Shashidhara Belagumba, learned counsel for
the petitioners and learned AGA Sri.M.Vinod Kumar for respondent No.1.
Constitution of India, praying for a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent not to harass the petitioners
3
and not to interfere with the business or money transaction of the petitioners and respondent Nos.2 and 3.
would be dealt with, in accordance with law.
mpk/ -* CT:bms
Sd/JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should issue a writ of mandamus to direct the police to refrain from harassing the petitioners and interfering with their financial transactions.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Radha W/O Late Narayana Reddy T
Raghavendra S/O Late Narayana Reddy T
Inspector of Police BOMMANAHALLI POLICE STATION
Smt. Kavitha W/O Krishna Reddy
G.M. Krishna Reddy S/O Marappa Reddy
S.G.Pandit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
