Dismissed
Manjaiah v. the Tahsildar
Karnataka HCWP/29640/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT
WRIT PETITION NO.29640 OF 2019(KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
MANJAIAH S/O NARASIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS ANNENAHALLI, OORUKERE POST, TUMKUR TALUK AND DISTRICT 572106.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI.K N LINGARAJU, ADVOCATE)
AND:
… RESPONDENTS
(ABSENT)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTICE PASSED BY R-3 DATED 01.10.2012 AS PER ANX-A OF THE W.P. AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
2
ORDER
There is non-compliance consecutively for fourth
time. The same shows that the Petitioner is no longer interested in prosecuting the Petition.
In view of the above, this Petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
Bsv
Manjiah S/o Narasiyappa
The Tahsildar, Tumkur Taluk, Tumkur District
The Deputy Commissioner, Tumkur Taluk, Tumkur District
Krishna S.Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court