The High Court of Karnataka held that a writ petition under Article 227 seeking quashing of an order in O.S.No.63/2013 was dismissed as it had become infructuous because the underlying suit was disposed of.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
WRIT PETITION NO. 27483 OF 2016 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. REVANASIDDAPPA H K, ADVOCATE)
AND
SRI K S BALAJI S/O SADASHIVA K AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.156, POLICE STATION ROAD, PANDAVAPUR TOWN MANDYA DISTRICT-571435 ...RESPONDENT (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR H B, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1)
2
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD. 11.4.2016 PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT PANDAVAPURA IN M.A.NO.01/2013 (VIDE ANNX-J) AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners
submit that the captioned writ petition arises out of O.S.No.63/2013 and the said suit is disposed of.
Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as
having become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
HDK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India lies for quashing the impugned order in underlying O.S.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SRI K S ASHOKA S/O LATE K SUBRAMANYA & ORS
SRI K S BALAJI S/O SADASHIVA K
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
