Petitioners sought direction to MLAs not to interfere with municipal functioning. The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous during preliminary hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
WRIT PETITION NO.2538 OF 2022 (LB-RES)
BETWEEN:
REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR A.OBLESH
REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR M.VENKATESHA
... PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. N.S.VIJAYANTH BABU, ADVOCATE)
AND:
2
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI PRATHIMA HONNAPURA, AGA FOR R-1 SRI PRASHANTH CHANDRA ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R6)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE NECESSARY ORDER OR NOTIFICATION BRINGING INTO THE KNOWLEDGE OF ALL THE MLAS IN THE STATE THAT THEY ARE REQUIRED NOT TO INTERFERE IN ANY MANNER WITH THE FUNCTIIONING OF EXECUTIVE OR ADMINISTRATIVE BODIES INCLUDING MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS, NOT TO PRESSURIZE THEM TO WORK IN A PARTICULAR MANNER OR TO DO A CERTAIN THING IN A MANNER NOT KNOWN TO LAW AND TO SEEK FAVORS FROM ANY SERVICE PROVIDER OR CONTRACTOR OR TO THREATEN THEM OF ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES.
3
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING-B GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
petition has become infructuous.
on record.
infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
GVP
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s Bharath Kumar Enterprises and Ors.
State of Karnataka
Hemant Chandangoudar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
