Petitioner sought interest on land acquisition compensation relying on doctrine of parity with other cases. Court disposed of petition by directing respondents to address grievance and pass appropriate orders within eight weeks.
Directing respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to address the petitioner's grievance and pass appropriate orders within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.21390 OF 2022 (LA-KIADB)
BETWEEN:
PARVATHAMMA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS D/O VENKATARAMANAPPA B K PALYA VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH (ADDL) TALUK BENGALURU DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
(BY SMT. SUMANGALA A. SWAMY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
2
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K.R. NITHYANANDA., AGA FOR R-1, R-4 & R-5; SRI. C. RAMAKRISHNA., ADVOCATE FOR R-2 & R-3)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 AND 3 TO PAY THE INTEREST TO THE PETITIONER AT THE RATE OF 18 PERCENT ON THE COMPENSATION AMOUNT OF RS.2,48,00,000/- PAID TOWARDS ACQUISITION OF THE LAND 4 ACRES SITUATED IN SY.NO.7, SITUATED AT B.K. PALYA VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH (ADDL) TALUKA FROM THE DATE OF POSSESSION 15.7.2009 TILL DATE OF PAYMENT.
THIS W.P. COMING ON FOR ORDERS , THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER
In this petition, petitioner has sought for the following reliefs:
3
4
4. Per contra, learned counsel for respondent
Nos.2 and 3 submits that if reasonable time is granted, respondent Nos.2 and 3 would address the grievance of the petitioner and take appropriate decision / pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.
Subject to the aforesaid directions, petition stands
disposed of.
Sd/JUDGE
SV
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should receive interest on land acquisition compensation similar to other successful petitioners.
Whether the respondents should address the petitioner's grievance and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.
Parvathamma
The State of Karnataka Department of Revenue
The Chief Executive Officer Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board
Special Land Acquisition Officer-II Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board
The Special Deputy Commissioner Bengaluru North
The Tahsildar Bengaluru North
S.R. Krishna Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
