Writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of Karnataka Administrative Tribunal orders via memo preferred by counsel praying leave to withdraw. The High Court of Karnataka rejected leave to withdraw, dismissing the petitions accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 01ST DAY OF APRIL, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.NARENDAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO.15720/2010 (S-KSAT) c/w WRIT PETITION NO.18416/2010 (S-KSAT)
IN W.P NO.15720/2010
BETWEEN:
SMT. M.C.NAGARATHNA, W/O R.RAMANNA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, PRINCIPAL, GOVERNMENT ITI, BAGEPALLI, CHIKKABALLAPURA. (BY SRI SATHISH.K, ADV.)
... PETITIONER
AND:
2
KOUSHALYA BHAVANA, DAIRY CIRCLE, BANGALORE – 560 027.
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. SHILPA S.GOGI, HCGP FOR R1 & R2.)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 1/4/2010 PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL IN APPLICATION NOS. 975/2010 (ANNEXURE-A TO THE WRIT PETITION) IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED ETC.
IN W.P NO.18416/2010
BETWEEN:
3
(BY SRI SATHISH.K, ADV.) AND:
4
... RESPONDENTS
DAIRY CIRCLE, BANGALORE - 560027
(BY SMT. SHILPA S.GOGI, HCGP FOR R1 & R2.)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 1.4.10 PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL IN APPLICATION NOS. 975/10 TO 981/10 VIDE ANNEX-A TO THE W.P. IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONERS ARE CONCERNED ETC.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ‘ORDERS’ THIS DAY, G.NARENDAR J, MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
A memo is preferred by learned counsel for the
petitioners praying leave of the Court to withdraw the petitions.
The memo is taken on record.
Accordingly, the petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
dn/CT-HR
Smt. M.C. Nagarathna
Smt. S. Vanaja
Smt. P. Rama
State of Karnataka
Commissioner for Employment and Training
G. Narendar
M.G.S. Kamal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
