Dismissed

M/S Vensa -Tsr (Jv) v. South Western Railway

Karnataka HC27 Oct 2022WP/18301/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner, a company, filed a writ petition seeking to quash an order regarding a tender for railway station development. The petitioner sought withdrawal of the petition on the ground that the respondent had withdrawn the tender on administrative grounds. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner on grounds that the respondent withdrew the tender.

M/S Vensa -Tsr (Jv) Vs South Western Railway — Company and Corporate | Karnataka HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

WP No. 18301 of 2022

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 27^TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO.18301 OF 2022 (GM-TEN)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

M/S VENSA -TSR (JV), REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.6-3-252/2/6, 1^ST AND 2^ND FLOOR, ERRAMAZIL, HYDERABAD – 500 082, TELANGANA STATE.

¶9

REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY/CFO SRI. A. VISHWESHWAR REDDY, A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT.

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI. SIDDHARTH SUMAN., ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

Digitally signed by PADMAVATHI B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY, BANGALORE CANTONMENT, BANGALORE – 560 046. REPRESENTED BY

¶15

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER CONSTRUCTION.

¶16

THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER CONSTRUCTION, SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY, BANGALORE CANTONMENT,

¶17

¶18

WP No. 18301 of 2022

¶19

BANGALORE -560 046.

¶20

THE CHIEF ENGINEER/CONSTRUCTION -I/BNC SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY, BANGALORE CANTONMENT, BANGALORE – 560 046.

¶21

…RESPONDENTS

¶22

(BY SRI.A.CHANDRACHUD, ADVOCATE)

¶23

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER/LETTER DATED 09.09.2022 ISSUED BY THE R2 I.E., ANNEXURE – A; DIRECT THE R2 TO TREAT THE PETITIONER AS A QUALIFIED BIDDER IN RESPECT OF TENDER NO........ DTD 30.05.2022 FOR DEVELOPMENT/REDEVELOPMENT OF BANGALORE CANTONMENT RAILWAY STATION ON ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT AND CONSTRUCTION (EPC) MODE IN THE TECHNICAL BID AND TO OPEN THE FINANCIAL BID OF THE PETITIONER AND TAKE APPROPRIATE FURTHER ACTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW FOR FINALISING THE TENDER BY INCLUDING THE PETITIONER AS AVALID AND QUALIFIED BIDDER AND ETC.,

¶24

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶25

ORDER

¶26

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner files a memo

¶27

seeking to withdraw the petition, which reads as follows;

¶28

"The petitioner above named, humbly prays, that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the

¶29

¶30

WP No. 18301 of 2022

¶31

petitioner to withdraw the above petition since the respondent have withdrawn the tender itself, on administrative grounds."

¶32

In terms of the memo, petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶33

Sd/JUDGE

¶34

PN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 71

M/S Vensa -Tsr (Jv) v. South Western Railway

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Vensa -Tsr (Jv) v. South Western Railway

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S B S Enterprises Vs the State of Karnataka

M/S Mahantesh Traders Vs the Karur Vysya Bank Limited

Mr. P. Anand Vardhan Reddy Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Chidananda Vs State of Karnataka

Dr Prakash Raj Wodeyar Vs Smtb.R.Uma Devi

Mr Rakesh Rai Vs the State of Karnataka