The petition was filed to quash an FIR registered for offences punishable under sections 420, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn after counsel filed a withdrawal memo.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn by the order of this court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP No. 18126 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JULY, 2022 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION NO. 18126 OF 2021 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MOHD. USMAN SHAIKH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by PADMAVATHI B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENT (BY SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 482 OF CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR FILED IN CRIME NO.180/2019 OF JP NAGAR POLICE STATION AND BEING INVESTIGATED BY CENTRAL CRIME BRANCH, ORGANIZED CRIME WING, REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCES
WP No. 18126 of 2021
PUNISHABLE U/S 420, 120(B) AND 34 OF INDIAN PENAL CODE.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner files a
memo seeking withdrawal of the petition.
In terms of memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
SJK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution read with Section 482 CrPC to quash the FIR should be allowed.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
SRI SANYAM GULATI
STATE OF KARNATAKA
M. NAGAPRASANNA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
