Smt. Mangamma v. the Deputy Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT
WRIT PETITION NO.16903 OF 2021(KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
SMT. MANGAMMA, W/O. DORAISWAMY, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, C/O. VAJAVELA MUDALIAR, R/AT BANNERGHATTA VILLAGE, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALUR DISTRICT, BENGALURU 560 105, (NOT CLAIMING ANY BENEFIT OF SENIOR CITIZENSHIP) ...PETITIONER (BY SRI.VASANTH KUMAR K M, ADVOCATE)
AND:
- THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU SOUTH SUB DIVISION, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, REVENUE BUILDING, KG ROAD, BENGALURU 560 001.
- THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU SOUTH SUB DIVISION, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, REVENUE BUILDING, KG ROAD, BENGALURU 560 001.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Smt. Mangamma, W/O. Doraishwamy
- respondent
The Deputy Commissioner, Bengaluru South Sub Division
- respondent
The Assistant Commissioner Bengaluru South Sub Division
- respondent
The Special Tahsildar Anelak Taluk, Anekal
- respondent
The Revenue Inspector, Jigani Circle, Anekal Taluk
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/16903/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court