Petition for quashing Land Tribunal orders and declaring occupancy rights was disposed off summarily as abated due to non-service and lack of steps taken against respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT
WRIT PETITION NO.16411 OF 2013 (LR)
BETWEEN:
PETITIONERS 1, 3 AND 4 ARE R/O AMURTSHVARANAHALLI VILLAGE, MALAVALLI TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI.H.B.CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE)
2
AND:
3
6 TO 8 ARE
R/O NO.12, MODEL HOUSE, RAJAPOOTH BLOCK, N.R.MOHALLA, MYSORE – 570 004.
4
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
18. NINGEGOWDA, S/O MARICHIKKEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
9TO 24 ARE R/O M.SHANTHILAL JAIN, AMURTSHVARANAHALLI VILLAGE, MALAVALLI TALUK – 571 434.
5
R12, R13, R19 – SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED; VIDE ORDER DATED 05.09.2017 PETITION STANDS ABATED AGAINST R16 AND R24; NOTICE TO R6-R8 VIDE ORDER DATED 22.07.2019 )
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT LAND TRIBUNAL, MALAVALLI TALUK, MALAVALLI PASSED IN LRF 466/1974-75, 470/1974-75 AND LRF 678/1974-75 DATED 24.2.2012 VIDE ANNEXURE-A IS ILLEGAL AND QUASH THE SAME CONSEQUENTLY GRANT THE OCCUPANCY RIGHTS TO THE PETITIONERS BY ALLOWING THE APPLICATION OF THE PETITIONER SOUGHT BY THEM VIDE ANNEXURE - G, H & K AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Petition is disposed off as having abated in view of no
steps having been taken in respect of respondents.
Sd/JUDGE
DS
A. VEEREGOWDA
EERAMMA
PUTTAGOWRAMMA
MAREEREGOWDA
The Land Tribunal, Malavalli Taluka
KRISHNA S.DIXIT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
