Writ petition filed to quash an FIR under Section 304-A IPC was dismissed as infructuous on preliminary hearing without detailed reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JUNE, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR WRIT PETITION NO.15449/2019 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
VISHAL AMLA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, REGIONAL MANAGER, BANGALORE REGIONAL OFFICE, MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED, 202, 2ND FLOOR, EMBASSY CLASSIC, VITAL MALLYA ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI C.V. NAGESH, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI GAUTAM S. BHARADWAJ, ADVOCATE) AND:
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI ROHITH B.J., HCGP FOR R-1; SRI UTHKARSH DIXIT, ADVOCATE FOR
2
G. JAYASHREE RAVINDRA, ADVOCATE FOR R-2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SECTION 482 OF CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR NO.047/2018 U/S 304-A DATED 03.02.2018 REGISTERED AT PS WHITEFIELD, BENGALURU CITY, MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A AS WELL AS ANY PROCEEDINGS EMANATING THEREFROM AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous.
The said submission is placed on record.
Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as having become
infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
BKM
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Vishal Amla
State of Karnataka Through the Station House Officer, Whitefield Police Station
Sh. Rajesh Ghatantti
Hemant Chandangoudar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
