Sri. Raghu v. the State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
In this Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, the Court disposed of the matter as infructuous. The petitioner challenged an auction notice, but the respondent State submitted that the auction had been cancelled, leaving the petitioner with no fresh cause of action to litigate.
What did the court decide?
Petition disposed of as infructuous with liberty to litigate on fresh cause of action.