Petitioner sought quashment under Article 227 of the Constitution. The writ petition was dismissed as not pressed at the hearing following the counsel's memo requesting withdrawal.
The writ petition was dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK.S.KINAGI
WRIT PETITION NO.132 OF 2021 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
SYED ANEES UR RAHMAN, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, S/O LATE M S ABUDUL RAHMAN AND LATE SARTAJ BEGUM, R/AT APARTMENT NO.A-102, IN THE APARTMENT KNOWN AS ROSARY APARTMENT NO.97, ST. JOHN.S CHURCH ROAD, BANGALORE – 560 005.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI.SYED UMMER, ADV.)
AND:
2
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT NO.37/1, B-TYPE, ROBERTSON ROAD, FRAZER TOWN, BANGALORE – 560 005.
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH/SET ASIDE THE ORDERS DATED 17.2.2017 PASSED ON IA NO.5 IN O.S.NO.4399/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE XII ADDL CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE AT BENGALURU CCH-27 VIDE W.P. ANENXURE - E AND CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS IA NO.5 AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR 'ORDERS' THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo
seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition as not pressed.
3
The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/JUDGE
ssb
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Syed Anees Ur Rahman
Mrs. Kauser Rafiq
Mrs. Ishrath Rahman
Mrs. Musarath Shariff
Ashok S. Kinagi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
