Disposed

Sri Pradeep M v. Rajiv Ghandi University of Health Sciences

Karnataka HC15 Nov 2022WP/1286/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition was filed by a student seeking consideration of representations for revaluation of subjects. The High Court directed the University to consider the representations without expressing an opinion on merits and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Respondent-1 directed to consider petitioner's representations for revaluation. Petitioner allowed to make one more representation.

Sri Pradeep M Vs Rajiv Ghandi University of… — Education and Admissions | Karnataka HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

WP NO.1286 OF 2022

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 15^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.1286 OF 2022 (EDN-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SRI. PRADEEP M. S/O SRI. MUNIRAJANAIKA B.S. AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS OCC: STUDENT, R/O 3^RD CROSS, CHIKKALAKIPALYA, HALEPALYA ROAD, TIPTUR.

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKHAR C. CHANASPUR, ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

RAJIV GHANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES KARNATAKA, 4^TH ‘T’ BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 041. REPRESENTED BY ITS VICE CHANCELLOR.

¶13

Digitally signed by ARUN KUMAR M S Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶14

ACHARYA DESHABHUSHAN AYURVEDIC MEDICAL COLLEGE BEDKIHAL-BEDKIHAL, SHAMANEWADI, CHIKKODI TALUK, BELGAVI DISTRICT, KARNATAKA - 531 214. REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL.

¶15

…RESPONDENTS

¶16

(BY SMT. FARAH FATHIMA, ADVOCATE FOR R1; RESPONDENT NO.2 SERVED & UNREPRESENTED)

¶17

¶18

WP NO.1286 OF 2022

¶19

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 04^TH OCTOBER, 2021 VIDE ANNEXURE-F AND ALSO ANNEXURE-G TO REVALUATION OF THE SUBJECTS AS MENTIONED THEREIN; AND ETC.

¶20

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶21

O R D E R

¶22

Heard Sri. Chandrashekhar C. Chanaspur, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Smt. Farah Fathima, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1-University.

¶23

The short question involved in this writ petition is with regard to consideration of the representation dated 04^th October, 2021 (Annexure-F) and 29^TH November, 2021 (Annexure-G). The petitioner has made representation to the respondent No.1-University, seeking revaluation of subjects as mentioned in the said representations.

¶24

Without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, respondent No.1-University is directed to consider the representation dated 04^th October, 2021 (Annexure-F) and 29^th November, 2021(Annexure-G) at the earliest. It is open for the petitioner to make one more representation to the respondent-

¶25

¶26

WP NO.1286 OF 2022

¶27

University to take decision in the matter at the earliest. If such

¶28

a representation is made by the petitioner within one week from today, the same shall be considered by the respondent No.2-University, within two weeks therefrom. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of.

¶29

SD/JUDGE

¶30

ARK

Sri Pradeep M v. Rajiv Ghandi University of Health Sciences

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Pradeep M v. Rajiv Ghandi University of Health Sciences

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri D Lingaraju Vs the State of Karnataka

Associated Managements of Primary and Vs State of Karnataka

The Mandya Town House Building Vs the Additional Registrar of

B. Ravishankar Vs State of Karnataka

Shri Amareshwar Karatagi Vs the State of Karnataka

Mr. B S Hemanth Vs Andhra Bank