Disposed

M/S. Rajini Foods v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC27 Jan 2022WP/110969/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Karnataka disposed of writ petitions seeking to quash FIRs registered for cheating and copyright offences. The court accepted the State HCGP's submission that the proceedings were closed upon filing of a B report and reserved liberty to the petitioners.

What did the court decide?

The writ petitions stand disposed off after accepting the submission that proceedings are closed via a B report; liberty to approach the court in future events is reserved.

M/S. Rajini Foods Vs the State of Karnataka — Intellectual Property | Karnataka HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH

¶2

DATED THIS THE 27^TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022

¶3

BEFORE

¶4

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

¶5

WRIT PETITION NOS.110969/2017 & 111364/2017 (GM-POLICE)

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

SMT.RAJINI W/O. SAI PRASAD BABU AGED ABUT 47 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, M/S. RAJINI FOODS H.NO.7-3-145, GANGANPAD WEST, RANGA REDDY DISTRICT, TELANGANA-501323.

¶8

SHRI D. SAI PRASAD BABU S/O LATE SHRI. D. SATYANARAYANA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, H.NO.7-3-145, GANGANPAD WEST, RANGA REDDY DISTRICT, TELANGANA-501323.

¶9

...PETITIONERS.

¶10

(BY SHRI B.C.JNANAYYA SWAMI, ADVOCATE.)

¶11

AND:

¶12

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH BELAGAVI MARKET POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENCH AT DHARWAD.

¶13

¶14

MR.HARISH GUPTA

¶15

NO.17-1-391/T-250, SARASWATI NAGAR COLONY, SAIDABAD, HYDERABAD-500059, TELANGANA.

¶16

…RESPONDENTS.

¶17

(BY SHRI RAMESH CHIGARI, HCGP, FOR R.1; R.2 – NOTICE SERVED.)

¶18

THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, READ WITH SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973, PRAYING TO QUASH THE FALSE COMPLAINT REGISTERED VIDE FIR NO.313/2017 AGAINST THESE PETITIONERS FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 420 OF THE INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 AND SECTION 63 OF THE COPYRIGHT ACT, 1957, REIGSTERED BY THE MARKET POLICE STATION, BELAGAVI, AS PER ANNEXURE-D, ETC.,.

¶19

THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B-GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶20

ORDER

¶21

The learned HCGP on instructions submits that the police after investigation have filed a ‘B’ report which is yet to be accepted and the proceedings closed in FIR in Crime No.313/2017 of Market Police Station, Belagavi. Placing the said submission on record and reserving liberty to the petitioners to

¶22

¶23

approach this Court in the event need arises in future, the present writ petitions stand disposed off.

¶24

SD JUDGE

¶25

Mrk/-

M/S. Rajini Foods v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S. Rajini Foods v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nanjundaswamy Vs the State of Karnataka

Mr Cheluvaraj Vs State by Udayagiri Police Station

The Residents Forum Vs the State of Karnataka

K. Raghavendra Shetty Vs Sri.Shivaputrappa

Smt.Sumitra @ Sangavva W/O Suryakant Sheelavantar Vs Channabasanagouda S/O Bichhanagouda

Smt.Sumitra @ Sangavva W/O Suryakant Sheelavantar Vs Channabasanagouda S/O Bichhanagouda