Preliminary hearing order in a writ petition challenging a Tribunal dismissal. Court directed the 2nd respondent to reconsider timings assigned to a bus operator upon receiving a representation, subject to due hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JULY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
WRIT PETITION No.10810/2022(MV)
BETWEEN :
SMT.REKHA R NAYAK W/O SRI.K.PRAKASH NAYAK AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS BUS OPERATOR PRABHU COMPOUND POST: AMBALAPADY, UDUPI – 576 102 ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI A.S.PARASARA KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND :
(BY SRI RAMESH JOIS, AGA FOR R1 & R2; SRI M.E.NAGESH, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
2
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE TRIBUNAL IN APPEAL NOS.147 AND 148/2020 DATED 28.12.2020 IN DISMISSING THE APPEALS ON THE GROUND THAT EITHER PARTIES OF PERMITS EXPIRED VIDE ANNEXURE – G.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
This petition is filed challenging the order passed by the Tribunal in Appeal Nos.147/2020 and 148/2020 dated 28.12.2020 dismissing the appeals filed by the petitioner challenging the variation of timings assigned to the respondent No.3.
3
representation dated 27.06.2022, if submitted by the petitioner in accordance with law, after hearing the respondent No.3, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
JUDGE
PKN
REKHA R NAYAK
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY SARIGE BHAVAN
SRI.VADIRAJ S/O SRI.D.P.SUVARNA
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
