Writ petition challenging an order under O.S. No.13/2013 was disposed of as infructuous since the underlying suit was already decided by the trial court in March 2020.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP No. 104923 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.DEVDAS
WRIT PETITION NO. 104923 OF 2018 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
TIPPANNA S/O SHANKARASA KATAVA, AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: GULEDAGUDDA, TQ: BADAMI, DIST: BAGALKOTE.
(BY SRI. P N HOSAMANE.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
VINAYAKA B V
Digitally signed by VINAYAKA B V Location: Dharwad Date: 2022.06.10 10:03:06 +0530
WP No. 104923 of 2018
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED:06.07.2018 PASSED BY PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C, BADAMI ON I.A.NO.6 IN O.S.NO.13/2013 AS PER ANNEXURE-"H" & ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
R.DEVDAS J., (ORAL):
Learned counsel for respondents No.1 to 5 has filed a memo dated 23.05.2022 stating that the suit in O.S. No. 13/2013 out of which the present petition arises has been disposed of by the trial Court by a judgment and decree dated 24.03.2020. Therefore, the learned counsel for the respondents submits that the prayer made in the writ petition has become infructuous.
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the said
fact.
Consequently, the writ petition stands disposed of as the prayer has become infructuous.
BVV
SD JUDGE
TIPPANNA S/O SHANKARASA KATAVA
HANAMAPPA S/O HONNAPPA PUJARI
R.DEVDAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
