Disposed

Sri. Veeresh S/O. Rudrappa Dadibhavi v. Smt. Aishwarya W/O. Veeresh Dadibhavi

Karnataka HC13 Jun 2022WP/101085/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This High Court disposed of a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution regarding maintenance orders. The court allowed disposal based on a settlement memo filed by the counsel, reserving liberty to file a fresh petition if the settlement fails.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was disposed of on the basis of the settlement memo, with liberty reserved to file a fresh petition if the settlement does not fructify.

Sri. Veeresh S/O. Rudrappa Dadibhavi Vs Smt… — Maintenance and Alimony | Karnataka HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

WP No. 101085 of 2022

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH

¶4

DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.DEVDAS

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO. 101085 OF 2022 (GM-FC)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SRI. VEERESH S/O. RUDRAPPA DADIBHAVI AGE. 37 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE, R/A. FLAT NO.303, NISARGA COMFORTS NISARGA HITECH LAYOUT, KANNURHALLI ROAD, HOSKOTE, BENGALURU RURAL-562114

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI. MRUTYUNJAY TATA BANGI.,ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

SMT. AISHWARYA W/O. VEERESH DADIBHAVI AGE. 32 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/A. HOSKOTE, BANGALORE RURAL, NOW RESIDING AT ROOPLAND, BAGALKOT-587101

¶14

…RESPONDENT

¶15

(BY SRI.PRUTHVIRAJ HITTALMANI, ADVOCATE)

¶16

VINAYAKAB V Digitally signedby VINAYAKA BVLocation:DharwadDate:2022.06.1510:01:02 +0530

¶17

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR DIRECTION TO AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY PRL. JUDGE FAMILY COURT BAGALKOT M.C.NO.28/2020 ON I.A.NO.3 DATED 08-02-2022 COPY AS ANNEXURE-J AND DISMISS I.A NO.3 BY ALLOWING THE PRESENT WRIT PETITION IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

¶18

THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶19

¶20

WP No. 101085 of 2022

¶21

ORDER

¶22

R.DEVDAS J., (ORAL):

¶23

Learned counsel Sri.Pruthviraj Hittalmani entered appearance for the respondent.

¶24

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 13.06.2022 stating that the parties have settled the matter before the trial court and two months time has been given for payment of permanent alimony. Therefore, the learned counsel prays that the matter may be disposed of.

¶25

Memo is taken on record subject to all just

¶26

exceptions.

¶27

Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of in view of the memo. Liberty is also reserved to the parties to file fresh petition on the same cause of action, if the settlement agreed upon does not fructify.

¶28

SD JUDGE

¶29

MBS/-

Sri. Veeresh S/O. Rudrappa Dadibhavi v. Smt. Aishwarya W/O. Veeresh Dadibhavi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri. Veeresh S/O. Rudrappa Dadibhavi v. Smt. Aishwarya W/O. Veeresh Dadibhavi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ratnavva B Cholachagudda Vs Ministry of Home Affairs

Shivakumar S/O Bhimanna Rakkasagi, Vs the Border Security Force

Uzma Suppliers Vs Karnataka State Board

Sri.Bhadrinarayan Vs the Deputy Commissioner

Shree Dattaguru Electricals Vs the Executive Engineer

Shri. Syed Yakub Hussaini Vs Shri. Badari Narayana S/O Shankar Rao Padaki