The Commissioner v. State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Karnataka disposed of Writ Appeal No.767/2021 by granting two weeks to appellants to comply with office objections, failing which the appeal would be dismissed without reference to the Bench.
What did the court decide?
Two weeks time granted to comply with office objections; otherwise appeal to be dismissed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
WRIT APPEAL NO.767/2021 (LA-BDA)
BETWEEN
- 1 . THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020.
- 2 . DEPUTY COMMISSIONER FOR LAND ACQUISITION, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020.
... APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. A.N. GANGADHARAIAH.,ADVOCATE)
Parties & counsel
- appellant
The Commissioner Bangalore Development Authority Kumara Park West, Bengaluru-560 020
- appellant
Deputy Commissioner for Land Acquisition, Bangalore Development Authority Kumara Park West, Bengaluru-560 020
- respondent
State of Karnataka By Its Secretary Department of Housing and Urban Development, Ms Building, Bengaluru-560 001
- respondent
Sri Gullappa S/o Late Venkatappa Aged About 82 Years
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- WA/767/2021
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Alok Aradhe S Vishwajith Shetty
- Order 2 · Anu Sivaraman Tara Vitasta Ganju
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court