In a regular second appeal under Section 100 CPC, the High Court of Karnataka noted that the appellant had filed a memo seeking withdrawal. The appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.G.S.KAMAL
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.402 OF 2016
BETWEEN:
SRI.P.JAYAPRAKASHA BABU, S/O LATE PALLAM SRIRAMULU, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/O NO.990, KAMAL NILAYA, 2ND MAIN, 4TH BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE – 10 AND ALSO AVAILABLE AT MUDDAYANAPALYA, VISHWANEEDAN POST, BANGALORE – 577 429.
... APPELLANT
(BY SRI.M.RAVINDRANATH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
GAJANANYA PATTASALI SANGA (R), BANGALORE, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.37, 4TH CROSS, SUDDAGUNTEPALYA, BANGALORE – 560 029.
2
REPRESENTED BY ITS 1.PRESIDENT, SRI.G.R.SATHYANARAYANAPPA, 2.SECRETARY, SRI.S.L.KRISHNAMURTHY,
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.B.RAMASWAMY IYENGAR, ADV., FOR C/R)
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 14.01.2016 PASSED IN RA NO.55/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. DISTRICT JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU, ALLOWING THE APPEAL FILED AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.11.2008 PASSED IN OS NO.98/2005 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. II CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.) BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant files a memo duly signed by the appellant, seeking withdrawal of the appeal.
3
The said memo is taken on record.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as
withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
Mkm
SRI.P.JAYAPRAKASHA BABU
GAJANANYA PATTASALI SANGA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
