Dismissed
Manohar S/O Ramakrishna Bongale v. Bhimappa S/O Basalingappa Kadli
Karnataka HCRSA/2237/2007
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 03RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.2237 OF 2007 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
MANOHAR S/O RAMAKRISHNA BONGALE SINCE DECEASED REP. BY LRS.
D/O MANOHAR BONGALE, AGE:45 YEARS, OCC:HOUSEHOLD, R/O RAVIVARPETH, OPP:KADALGIKAR HOSPITAL, GOKAK, BELAGAVI.
S/O MANOHAR BONGALE, AGE:32 YEARS, OCC:BUSINESS, R/O RAVIVARPETH, OPP:KADALGIKAR HOSPITAL, GOKAK, BELAGAVI.
W/O MAHESH GONDKAR, AGE: 30 YEARS, OCC:HOUSE HOLD, R/O RAVIVARPETH, OPP:KADALGIKAR HOSPITAL, GOKAK, BELAGAVI.
1(D). SMT.AMRUTH W/O AJAY KUDALKAR, AGE:26 YEARS, OCC:HOUSE HOLD, R/O RAVIVARPETH,
2
OPP:KADALGIKAR HOSPITAL, GOKAK, BELAGAVI.
1(E). KUMARI SHREEDEVI D/O MANOHAR BONGALE, AGE:22 YEARS, OCC:STUDENT, R/O RAVIVARPETH, OPP:KADALGIKAR HOSPITAL, GOKAK, BELAGAVI.
...APPELLANTS
[BY SRI.RAMAKRISHNA HEGDE, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)]
AND:
BHIMAPPA S/O BASALINGAPPA KADLI, AGE:46 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE, R/O BENCHINAMARDI, GOKAK TALUK, BELAGAVI DIST- 591 307.
… RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.S.S.BADAWADAGI, ADVOCATE)
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, 1908, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 14.06.2007, PASSED BY THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE SR. DN., GOKAK, IN R.A.NO.127/2006 REVERSING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 13.09.2006, PASSED BY THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN., GOKAK, IN O.S.NO.326/1997, ETC., .
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Though matter is called twice, there is no
representation on behalf of appellants.
3
The captioned appeal is listed in until disposal list. On 02.11.2022, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of appellants. Today also there is no representation on behalf of appellants.
As could be seen from the appeal papers, the appeal is filed in the year 2007. Now we are in the month of November 2022. As already noted above, though matter is called yesterday and today, there is no representation on behalf of appellants. Hence, this Regular Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
MRK
Manohar S/O Ramakrishna Bongale LRS
Bhimappa S/O Basalingappa Kadli
Jyoti Mulimani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court