High Court of Karnataka dismissed Regular Second Appeal as infructuous because the parties amicably resolved the matter, leaving no issue for consideration. No legal proposition established.
Appeal dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.G.S.KAMAL
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1609 OF 2014
BETWEEN:
Both are R/at Kempe Gowda Road, Belur Town, Belur Taluk-573115, Hasana District. ... Appellants
(By Sri. Krishnamoorthy D, Advocate)
AND:
Smt. Honnamma W/o Srinivasa, Aged about 65 years, Kempe Gowda Road, Belur Town, Belur Taluk-573115, Hasana District. …Respondent (By Sri. D.G.Chinnappa Gowda, Advocate)
This appeal is filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment & Decree dated
2
04.08.2014 passed in R.A.No.5/2014 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Belur, allowing the appeal and setting aside the judgment and decree dated 25.01.2014 passed in O.S.No.57/2008 on the file of the Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Belur.
This appeal coming on for admission this day, the court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Sri Krishnamoorthy D., learned counsel appearing for the appellants and Sri D.G.Chinnapa Gowda, learned counsel for the respondent submit that the matter is amicably resolved between the parties, as such nothing survives for consideration in this matter.
Said submissions are placed on record.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
MKM
Umarabba S/o Gulam Beary
Iqbal S/o Umarabba
Smt. Honnamma W/o Srinivasa
M.G.S.Kamal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
