In a regular second appeal under Section 100 of CPC, the appellant sought permission to withdraw the appeal, which was granted, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the appeal was granted; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S. SANJAY GOWDA
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1341/2018 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
SRI. RAMEGOWDA, S/O LATE PUTTEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, DEAD BY HIS LRS
2
SL.NO.1 AND 3 ARE R/AT KURUBARA HOSA HALLY, HANAGODU HOBLI, HUNSUR TALUK – 571 105.
… APPELLANTS
(BY SRI B.S. NAGARAJ, ADVOCATE)
AND :
SMT. NETHARAVATHI, W/O LATE PUTTA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/AT SHIVAPPA BADAVANE, PERIYA PATNA TOWN – 571 107.
… RESPONDENT
(SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED U/S SECTION 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 22.03.2018 PASSED IN RA NO.28/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HUNSUR, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 11.01.2016 PASSED IN OS NO.38/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HUNSUR.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
3
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellants submits that
he may be permitted to withdraw this appeal.
2. Permission sought for is granted. Appeal is
dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
Sbs*
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SRI. RAMEGOWDA, S/O LATE PUTTEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, DEAD BY HIS LRS, 1. MR. LOKESHA, S/O RAME GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, 2. SMT. SAVITHA, W/O YOGESHA, AG
SMT. NETHARAVATHI, W/O LATE PUTTA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS
N.S. SANJAY GOWDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
