Regular Second Appeal filed under Section 100 CPC was dismissed as withdrawn after appellant's counsel filed a memo seeking withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1144 OF 2018 (MON)
BETWEEN
SRI. SATHYAPRASAD AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS S/O. SATHYAMOORTHI SAIRAKSHA HOUSE ARYAPU VILLAGE PUTTUR TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT. (BY SRI. CHANDRAKANTH ARIGA K., ADVOCATE)
... APPELLANT
AND
SRI. K. SAIKIRAN AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS S/O. SATHYAMOORTHI CHARANASANNIDHI MELKATTA YENEKALLU VILLAGE SULLIA TALUK D.K. DISTRICT.
... RESPONDENT
(RESPONDENT SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, PRAYING TO SETASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.03.2018 IN R.A. NO.161/2009 PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SULLIA, D.K., AND SET-ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.10.2009 PASSED BY THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SULLIA, IN O.S. NO.45/2008 AND DECREE THE SUIT IN O.S.
2
NO.45/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SULLIA.
THIS RSA COMING ON FOR ORDERS THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a
memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal.
Memo is placed on record.
Regular Second Appeal is dismissed as
withdrawn.
Sd/-
snc
Sri. Sathyaprasad
Sri. K. Saikiran
Sachin Shankar Magadum
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
