The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a second appeal for non-prosecution by the appellant, who was absent, and non-compliance of office objections filed multiple years prior.
None. Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution and non-compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.100188 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
SHRI.BASAPPA S/O STAYAPPA MANNI AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: PVT. SERVICE, R/O: KALLIGUDDA, TQ: HUNAGUND, DIST:BAGALKOTE.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI V.G.BHAT, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)
AND:
1 . IRAPPA S/O NAGAPPA BADIGER AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC:CARPENTER, R/O: BALAKUNDI, TQ:HUNAGUND, DIST: BAGALKOTE.
2 . SMT. SARASWATI W/O SHEKHAPPA BADIGER AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC:HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: BALAKUNDI, TQ:HUNAGUND, DIST: BAGALKOTE.
3 . SHRIKANTAPPA S/O NAGAPPA BADIGER AGE 45 YEARS, OCC:BUSINESS, R/O: BALAKUNDI, TQ HUNAGUND, DIST: BAGALKOTE.
2
R/O: ILAKAL, TQ:HUNAGUND, DIST: BAGALKOTE.
… RESPONDENTS
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, 1908, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 23.04.2018, PASSED IN R.A.NO.40/2018, PASSED BY PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALKOTE AND REMAND THE MATTER FOR FRESH HEARING AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 03.03.2018, PASSED ON IA’S NO.8 TO 10 IN E.P.NO.05/2013 PASSED BY THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HUNGUND, ETC.,.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Though the matter is called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant.
The captioned appeal is listed for orders regarding non compliance of office objections for second time.
The appeal is filed in the year 2019. We are in the month of October, 2022. So far the office objections are not complied with and there is no representation on
3
behalf of appellant though the matter is called twice. Hence the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution and also for non compliance of office objections.
Sd/JUDGE
MRK
Basappa S/o Stayappa Manni
Irappa S/o Nagappa Badiger
Saraswati W/o Shekhappa Badiger
Shrikantappa S/o Nagappa Badiger
Suresh S/o Shivappa Gadag
Jyoti Mulimani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
