Dismissed
Shri.Mahadev Yallappa Maddi v. Smt.Ambavva W/O. Laxman Bhirade @ Yadav
Karnataka HCRSA/100006/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 01ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.100006 OF 2019 (SP)
BETWEEN:
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI S.T. PATIL, ROHIT S. PATIL AND YALLAPPA ALADAKATTI, ADVOCATES, (ABSENT))
AND:
2
… RESPONDENTS
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.03.2010, ON THE FILE OF THE FAST TRACK COURT, ATHANI, IN R.A.NO.35/1997 AND THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 26.03.1997, ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. MUNCIFF COURT, ATHANI, IN O.S.NO.261/1998.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Though the matter is called twice, there is no representation on behalf of appellants.
This appeal is listed today for non compliance of office objections for the third time.
As could be seen from the appeal papers, the regular second appeal is filed in the year 2019. Now we are almost completing the year 2022. So far office objections are not complied with. As already noted above,
3
though the matter is called twice, there is no
representation on behalf of appellants.
Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non compliance of office objections and also for non prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
MRK
Shri Mahadev Yallappa Maddi
Shri Nagappa Yallappa Maddi
Smt. Ambavva W/o Laxman Bhirade
Subash Laxman Bhirade
Maruti Yallappa Maddi
Jyoti Mulimani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court