Sri Dakshinamurthy H T v. Smt. Ambika M N @ Parvathamma
Case brief
What is this about?
Rape and Fornication Petition filed in Family Court dismissed as office objections remained uncleared despite the order granting time.
Rape and Fornication Petition filed in Family Court dismissed as office objections remained uncleared despite the order granting time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 03RD DAY OF MARCH, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
RPFC NO.53 OF 2020
BETWEEN:
Sri Dakshinamurthy H.T., S/o Sri Thandava Murthy, Aged about 38 years, R/at No.2607, 6th ‘A’ Main Road, Hampinagara, Vijayanagar 2nd Stage, Near Swimming Pool, Bengaluru-560040.
…Petitioner
(By Sri M.Shanthaveeraiah, Advocate - Absent)
AND:
Smt. Ambika M.N., @ Parvathamma, W/o Sri Dakshinamurthy, Aged about 30 years, R/at No.1243, Madilu P.G., 4th Main ‘E’ Block, 2nd Stage, Rajajinagar, Bengaluru-560010.
…Respondent
This RPFC is filed under Section 19(4) of Family Courts Act, against the judgment dated 21.07.2018 passed in Crl.Misc.No.597/2015 on the file of the III Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Bengaluru, partly allowing the petition filed under Section 125 of Cr.P.C., for maintenance.
:: 2 ::
This RPFC coming on for orders this day, the Court made the following:
ORDER
Counsel for the petitioner is absent. The
matter is listed for 8th time for removing the office objections. On 13.12.2021, peremptory order was passed granting two weeks time for removing the office objections. Since then the office objections have remained uncleared. Therefore petition is
dismissed .
Sd/JUDGE
Kmv/-
Sri Dakshinamurthy H.T.
Smt. Ambika M.N.
SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court