Dismissed

Sri Chethan C G v. Smt Pruthvi T M

Karnataka HC24 Nov 2022RPFC/273/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This revision petition, filed under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act to set aside impugned orders in pending maintenance proceedings, was admitted for orders. The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition, reserving liberty to challenge the impugned order before the appropriate authority.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty reserved to challenge impugned order before appropriate authority.

Sri Chethan C G Vs Smt Pruthvi T M — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Karnataka HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

RPFC No. 273 of 2022

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 24^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN REVISION PETITION FAMILY COURT NO. 273 OF 2022

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SRI CHETHAN C.G. S/O. GOVINDASWAMY AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS

¶9

R/AT #133, NEAR CHANNAKESHAVASWAM TEMPLE CHIKKAJALA, JALAHOBLI

¶10

YELAHANKA TALUK.

¶11

…PETITIONER

¶12

Digitally signed by V MANJUSHA BAI Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶13

(BY SRI.PRAKASH A., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. NEGLUR ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)

¶14

AND:

¶15

SMT. PRUTHVI T.M. W/O. CHETHAN C.G. D/O. MUNISWAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS

¶16

R/AT THIMAHALLI VILLAGE NANDHI HOBLI, MUDDENAHALLI POST CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK

¶17

CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT.

¶18

…RESPONDENT

¶19

THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDERS PASSED BY THE HON'BLE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL

¶20

¶21

RPFC No. 273 of 2022

¶22

JUDGE AND JMFC AT DEVANAHALLI DATED 30.08.2022 PASSED IN M.C. NO.63/2020 ON I.A. NO.2 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 24 OF HINDU MARRIAGE ACT READ WITH SECTION 151 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AND BE PLEASED TO PASS NECESSARY ORDERS DEEM FIT TO THE CIRCUMSTANCES, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE, EQUITY AND LAW.

¶23

THIS RPFC COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶24

ORDER

¶25

Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that he may

¶26

be permitted to withdraw the instant petition reserving liberty to the petitioner to challenge the impugned order before the appropriate Authority by filing appropriate proceedings in accordance with law. He also undertakes to file a memo in this regard.

¶27

Submission is placed on record.

¶28

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn

¶29

reserving liberty to the petitioner to challenge the impugned order before the appropriate Authority by filing appropriate proceedings.

¶30

¶31

RPFC No. 273 of 2022

¶32

4. Office is directed to return back the original and

¶33

certified copies of the documents filed by the petitioner after obtaining photocopies of the same upon due verification.

¶34

In view of dismissal of the main petition, pending interlocutory applications if any, do not survive for consideration and the same are hereby disposed of.

¶35

SD/JUDGE

¶36

VMB

Sri Chethan C G v. Smt Pruthvi T M

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Chethan C G v. Smt Pruthvi T M

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Sreedevi Infra Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Vs P N Venkataranayana Babu

Smt Sannamma Vs the State by the Inspector of Police

Kirti K Mehta Vs State of Karnataka by

The Deputy Chief Engineer Vs Sri H R Shivappa

The Deputy Chief Engineer Vs Smt Gowramma

The Deputy Chief Engineer Vs Channakeshava