This review petition under Order 114 CPC was not disposed of; the Court granted two weeks to comply with office objections, failing which the petition stands rejected as per the note.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S. DIXIT REVIEW PETITION NO. 262 OF 2022
BETWEEN
CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA
S/O SADAPPA,
SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS, AGED AGOUT 80 YEARS
1. MOTAMMA
W/O CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
D/O CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
3 . KEMPAMMA
W/O CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
…2
RP NO. 262/2022
2
4 . VENKATA SWAMY,
S/O CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
...Petitioner/s
PETITIONER NO. 1 TO 4 ARE RESIDING
AT A.K. COLONY, MALUR TOWN,
KOLAR DISTRICT-563130
(By Sri./Smt : KALEEMULLA SHARIF AND SUKANYA H.D., ADVOCATES)
AND
ABDUL SATTAR KHAN,
S/O LATE ABDUL RAHEEM SAB
SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS
W/O ZAHEER AHMED AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
R/A THIMMAIAH ROAD
BENGALURU – 560053
S/O ABDUL SATTAR, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/A NIZAM MAHOOLA,
…3
RP NO. 262/2022
3
MALUR TALUK,
KOLAR DISTRICT – 563130
BANGALORE DISTRICT
W/O ABDUL KHALEEL AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/A NIZAM MAHOOLA MALUR TALUK
KOLAR DISTRICT – 563130
W/O MOHEMMED GHOUSE, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS , R/A THIMMAIHA ROAD, BENGALURU – 560053
…4
RP NO. 262/2022
4
R/A OPP GREEN SHIVAJINAGAR ,
BANGALORE – 563120
W/O MOHEMED ANSER , AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/A KOODIYANUR VILLAGE, MALUR TALUK,
KOLAR DISTRICT – 563130
S/O LATE ABDUL SATTAR, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/A KOLMI RAMAIAH LAYOUT, MALUR TOWN, MALUR,
KOLAR DISTRICT – 563130
S/O BYRAPPA, EX-MUNICIPAL COUNCILLOR
R/A A.K COLONY, MALUR TOWN, MALUR, KOLAR DISTRICT – 563130 … Respondent/s
THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER HAS FILED THE ABOVE
REVIEW PETITION UNDER ORDER 114 OF CPC, PRAYING
…5
RP NO. 262/2022
5
THIS HONBLE COURT TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED: 14/10/2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 41929/2019 AND WRIT PETITION NO. 47800/2019 (GM-CPC) DATED:14/10/2019 BY THIS HON’BLE COURT AND RESTORE THE IN ORDER DATED: 16/03/2019 IN EX.CASE NO.20/2005 AND ORDER DATED 17/08/2019 PASSED ON I.A.NO.19 BEFORE THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (Jr. Dv) AND JMFC, MALUR, PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE- IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
This Review Petition is coming on for orders this day, the Court made the following Order.
ORDER
Two weeks time is granted to comply office objections failing which, petition stands rejected on its own.
Sd/- JUDGE
…6
RP NO. 262/2022
6
NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 21.10.2022, office objections are not complied with, hence petition stands rejected.
COPY
Sd/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
T By: SR R By :VS C By: CDJ Ty Date: 14.02.2023 C Date: 14.02.2023
1 provisions across 1 enactments
CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA S/O SADAPPA SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS
MOTAMMA W/O CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA
SHANTHAMMA D/O CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA
KEMPAMMA W/O CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA
ABDUL SATTAR KHAN S/O LATE ABDUL RAHEEM SAB
SMT PARVEEN TAJ
KRISHNA S. DIXIT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
