The High Court of Karnataka dismisses a review petition filed to restrain illegal construction. The petition was admitted in abstraction by withdrawal of the petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
REVIEW PETITION NO.20 OF 2020
BETWEEN:
Smt. Yallamma, D/o Eerappa and Smt. Lingamma, Aged about 60 years, R/at 1st Division, Kumbar Bedi, Sarjapura, Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru-560057.
…Petitioner
(By Sri Vasanthappa, Advocate)
AND:
Sri B.S.Manjunath, S/o late B.N.Seetharamaiah, Aged about 51 years, R/at No.29, 2nd Cross, BTM 4th Stage, Bengaluru-560057.
…Respondent
This Review Petition is filed under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 114 of CPC, praying to review the judgment dated 25.06.2019 passed in MFA No.3849/2018 by this Hon’ble court and restrain the respondent from putting up illegal construction in site No.9 and 10 (respondent claimed these properties as site No.3 and 4) of the building in the schedule property.
This Review Petition coming on for orders through video conferencing this day, the Court made the following:
:: 2 ::
ORDER
Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this review petition as it has become infructuous. His submission is placed on record. Accordingly, review petition is dismissed as
withdrawn .
Sd/JUDGE
Kmv/-
Smt. Yallamma, D/o Eerappa and Smt. Lingamma
Sri B.S.Manjunath
Sreenivas Harish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
